Case Study Defamation In Malaysia

Judge azman abu hassan said the court found wong had proven her case and that the remarks made by lee were indeed defamatory.

Case study defamation in malaysia. For civil cases the relevant legislation is the defamation act 1957. Azman ordered lee to pay wong rm350 000 in general damages and rm50. 4 laws of malaysia act 286 defamation 5 laws of malaysia act 286 defamation act 1957 an act relating to the law of libel and slander and other malicious falsehoods. In this case lee kong seng was sued for defamation for his defamatory statements posted in certain facebook public forums and on his own facebook.

Defamation generally occurs in printing in articles books even scientific publications where one. Instead the definition of defamation is to be found in malaysian case law and the english common law. Web pioneer wants new contract for internet. Defamation is not always practised to damage someone s reputation on purpose but it is still considered to be a crime.

Defamation generally occurs in printing in articles books even scientific publications where one. Defamation is the spread of the malicious statements which cause harm to the reputation of an individual a group of people an organization etc. Defamation is the spread of the malicious statements which cause harm to the reputation of an individual a group of people an organization etc. Facebook account owner.

Criminal defamation is covered by chapter xxi sections 499 to 502 of the penal code. By virtue of section 3 of the civil law act 1956 the common law of england as at 7 april 1956 in relation to defamation is applicable in malaysia. Sabah and sarawak 6 may 1965 l n. Peninsular malaysia 1 july 1957.

The defamation act does not define the word defamation. Defamation is not always practised to damage someone s reputation on purpose but it is still considered to be a crime. In malaysia the recent case of gs realty sdn bhd v lee kong seng has set the precedent for the imposition of liability for third party comments. This act may be cited as the defamation act 1957.

Was successful before a jury in the high court the case was appealed to the irish supreme court on grounds that the damages awarded at first instance eur 1 872 000 were excessive. Given the fundamental importance of the right to freedom of expression and its recognition in article 10 of the malaysian constitution article 19 urges the court to. Ahead of malaysia human right defender and blogger charles hector s defamation trial on 28 29 june 2011 article 19 calls on the malaysian court to consider the case in line with international freedom of expression standards. 179 1965 short title 1.

Twitter bots had disproportionate role spreading misinformation in 2016 election.