Repco Holdings V Public Prosecutor
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Repco Low Found Guilty Of Market Manipulation The Edge Markets
Repco Low Found Guilty Of Market Manipulation The Edge Markets
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Ex repco holdings bhd executive chairman low thiam hock was today sentenced to five years jail and fined rm5 million for manipulating the company s share during the 1997 stock market crash.
Repco holdings v public prosecutor. 2 repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor 1997 3 mlj 681 tuduhan adalah dibawah suruhanjaya sekuriti. In 1999 justice datuk gopal sri ram sitting as a high court judge decided in repco holdings bhd v pp that article 145 3. Criminal revision no w 43 7 of 1997. Perkara ini katakana bercanggah dengan artikel 145 3 perlembagaan yang hanya menyatakan peguam negara.
Abdul hamid v pp 1956 mlj 231. Repco holdings bhd v pp 1997 3 mlj 681. On feb 29 2016 sessions court judge mat ghani abdullah sentenced low 58 to five years in prison and rm5 million fine after finding him guilty of manipulating repco holdings berhad s share price. About the public prosecutor.
Repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor 1997 3 mlj 681 section 86 of the securities industry act 1983 false or misleading statements etc. Subject to section 87b a person shall not make a statement or disseminate information that is false or misleading in a material particular and is likely to induce the sale or purchase of securities by other persons or is likely to have the effect. Pemohon iaitu repco holdings bhd repco telah dipertuduhkan oleh suruhanjaya sekuriti suruhanjaya tersebut. Repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor.
Repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor 1997 3 mlj 681 decision section 126 2 of the securities industry act 1983 and section 39 2 of the securities commission act 1993 were ultra vires article 145 3 of the federal constitution article 4 federal constitution this constitution is the supreme law of the federation and any law passed after merdeka day which is inconsistent with. That decision amounts to institution of prosecution institution means commencement of prosecution pp v dato harun idris 6. Peguam membantah kehadiran pegawai pendakwa dibawah seksen 126 2 yang membenarkan pendakwaan dijalankan oleh pendaftar syarikat. To assist him the public prosecutor may appoint and authorise other persons such as the assistant and deputy public prosecutors advocates police officers.
Repco holdings bhd v public prosecutor 1997 3 mlj 681 high court kuala lumpur gopal sri ram jca criminal revision no w 43 7 of 1997 2 october 1997 fakta kes.
Ex Repco Holdings Boss Jailed Five Years Fined Rm5 Million
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Cpc Conduct Of Proceeding
Chapter 2 Consent Sanction Criminal Procedure Ii Law 611 Studocu
Repco Holdings Bhd V Public Prosecutor 1997 3 Mlj 681 Facts Section 86 Course Hero
Repco Holdings Bhd V Public Prosecutor 1997 3 Mlj 681 Facts Section 86 Course Hero
Repco Holdings Bhd V By Zai Osman
Law 4310 04 Public Prosecutor Studocu
Repco Holdings Bhd V Public Prosecutor 1997 3 Mlj 681 Facts Section 86 Course Hero
344051 102034 The Office And Power Of The Public Prosecutor Studocu
Tutorial 3 Docx Tutorial Eix1002 Introduction To Law Gopal Sri Ram Jca In The Case Of Repco Holdings Bhd V Public Prosecutor 1997 3 Mlj 681 Held That Course Hero
Https Www Studocu Com My Document Universiti Malaya Criminal Procedure 1 Tutorial Work Tutorial 6 Powers Of Pp 7409278 View
